top of page
CBB Gameday Projections
Key
Method:
Line is Playable if Adjusted Efficiency is above 20 and FG% is above 10
Line is Playable if Adjusted Efficiency is below 5 and FG% is below 2.5
Double Digit
Favorite Cover
Single Digit
Favorite Cover
Double Digit
Underdog Cover
Single Digit
Underdog Cover
Line is Playable if Adjusted Efficiency is above 12 and FG% is above 5
Margin Difference
Line is Playable if it beats the current spread line
Michigan St.
Purdue
MSU
Teams
Conf.
Games Played
Record
Adjusted Efficiency:
FG%:
105.7
50.5
TO%:
17.1
Reb%:
29
FT%:
32.9
2P%:
50.3
3P%:
33.9
3P Rate:
37.3
67.5
PACE:
PUR
B10
B10
14
5–9
3–7
113.8
96.1
.8757
50.4
54.8
14.9
18.9
vs.
27.4
26.7
26.5
35.1
47.3
53.9
38.9
37.5
28.5
37.5
66.4
16
16–0
10–0
131.0
94.3
.9777
60.3
45.9
14.9
14.6
37.0
23.6
45.2
21.4
55.9
45.6
45.0
31.0
37.6
37.5
69.5
MSU
PUR
Points Average
Home / Away
Last 3
MSU
MSU
MSU
MSU
MSU
MSU
MSU
MSU
PUR
PUR
PUR
PUR
PUR
PUR
PUR
PUR
-19
19
-18.8
18.8
-4.3
4.3
-12.7
12.7
32.4
16.9
12.6
12.3
-7.50
Spread
69.05
68.2
81.25
75
Margin Difference Method
Projected Winner
MSU
PUR
5.50
Points
68.77
79.17
Cover Method
Double Digit Fav.
Single Digit Fav.
Single Digit Dog
Double Digit Dog
Purdue
Weighted Average Method
Team
Team
Percent
MSU
PUR
-13.34%
13.34%
Mississippi St.
Tennessee
MSST
Teams
Conf.
Games Played
Record
Adjusted Efficiency:
FG%:
105.7
50.5
TO%:
17.1
Reb%:
29
FT%:
32.9
2P%:
50.3
3P%:
33.9
3P Rate:
37.3
67.5
PACE:
TENN
SEC
SEC
17
9–8
2–7
111.3
95.2
.8584
50.4
47.8
17.9
17.3
vs.
34.7
27.8
32.8
33.3
51.5
50.5
32.5
29.3
38.2
29.3
68.3
16
14–2
7–2
117.6
86.9
.9702
53.7
42.0
13.9
20.5
33.7
28.2
33.2
31.5
52.8
41.4
36.6
28.5
40.4
42.1
70.4
MSST
TENN
Points Average
Home / Away
Last 3
MSST
MSST
MSST
MSST
MSST
MSST
MSST
MSST
TENN
TENN
TENN
TENN
TENN
TENN
TENN
TENN
-14.6
14.6
-9.1
9.1
-0.8
0.8
1.4
-1.4
2.2
10.4
4.9
1.4
Spread
67.95
74.35
77.75
74.35
Margin Difference Method
Projected Winner
MSST
TENN
5.50
Points
70.08
76.62
Cover Method
Double Digit Fav.
Single Digit Fav.
Single Digit Dog
Double Digit Dog
Weighted Average Method
Team
Team
Percent
MSST
TENN
-30.05%
30.05%
Houston
Texas Tech
HOU
Teams
Conf.
Games Played
Record
Adjusted Efficiency:
FG%:
105.7
50.5
TO%:
17.1
Reb%:
29
FT%:
32.9
2P%:
50.3
3P%:
33.9
3P Rate:
37.3
67.5
PACE:
TTU
B12
B12
15
12–3
6–3
118.8
91.2
.9542
48.3
47.1
13.6
20.3
vs.
34.6
33.1
25.3
39.9
46.5
46.7
34.2
31.8
36.4
31.8
63.4
17
15–2
7–2
115.5
96.3
.8901
51.4
46.4
15.1
18.6
33.7
29.7
36.0
21.3
51.5
48.4
34.1
28.9
38.5
40.2
67.0
HOU
TTU
Points Average
Home / Away
Last 3
HOU
HOU
HOU
HOU
HOU
HOU
HOU
HOU
TTU
TTU
TTU
TTU
TTU
TTU
TTU
TTU
8.4
-8.4
-3.8
3.8
-0.2
0.2
-2.5
2.5
29.3
3.3
2.8
0.8
9.50
Spread
67
66
75.65
71.15
Margin Difference Method
Projected Winner
HOU
TTU
1.50
Points
66.67
74.15
Cover Method
Double Digit Fav.
Single Digit Fav.
Single Digit Dog
Double Digit Dog
Weighted Average Method
Team
Team
Percent
HOU
TTU
-78.12%
78.12%
bottom of page